- Final draft 9 compatibility full#
- Final draft 9 compatibility windows 10#
- Final draft 9 compatibility software#
In an interview with HT in September, Patnaik argued that the lack of state DPAs would raise issues of federal override. The governments of Karnataka and Maharashtra sought this during the meetings of their representatives with the committee. The people familiar with the matter said that Biju Janata Dal MP Amar Patnaik is also likely to object to a lack of inclusion of state-level DPAs in the bill. They also raised concerns regarding the selection of the DPA chairperson, and said it has a “heavy involvement of the central government”. O’Brien and Mitra have highlighted that the process of consensus building on the report has been “rushed”, slamming the final draft for a “lack of adequate safeguards for the protection of the privacy of the data principal”. Gogoi noted the report has failed to “quantify penalties under the framework”. He also flagged concerns against Sections 35 and 12, along with a lack of “parliamentary oversight and engagement”. Gogoi cited a “lack of attention” paid to “harms arising from surveillance” and said a “modern surveillance framework” may be created. Ramesh added that Section 12, which covers non-consensual processing of data by the government, should have been made “less sweeping”.
He has argued the section provides unbridled power to exempt any of the government agencies from the proposed law. Ramesh filed his note contesting the exemptions to the government under Section 35 of the bill. Now, for the debate in Parliament,” Ramesh tweeted hours before the panel’s meeting was set to begin. But that should not detract from the democratic manner in which the Committee has functioned. I’m compelled to submit a detailed dissent note. “Today (Monday), the Joint Parliamentary Committee on Personal Data Protection Bill 2019 will adopt its report. He has added that critical personal data should be decided by the DPA, and not the government.Ĭongress MP Jairam Ramesh has also opposed the exemptions granted to the government and its agencies. He also opposed age-gating of child-friendly online resources and asked for social media firms to mandatorily verify all its users/ subscribers, failing which they should be fined between 3-5% of their global turn over. A bill that seeks therefore to provide blanket exemptions either in perpetuity or even for a limited period to the ‘State’ and its instrumentalities, in my estimation is ultra vires of the Fundamental Right to Privacy as laid down by a 9-judge bench of the Supreme Court of India in Re Puttuswamy (2017) 10 SCC 1,” the MP argued. In my limited experience of three decades as a litigator, I have always been taught and made to appreciate that a Fundamental Right is principally enforceable against the state.
Final draft 9 compatibility full#
“The bill as it stands creates two parallel universes – one for the private sector where it would apply with full rigor and one for government where it is riddled with exemptions, carve outs and escape clauses. In a 10-page dissent note, reviewed by HT, he stated that there is an “inherent design flaw” in the very construction of the Bill.
Tewari has objected to the entirety of the Bill in its present form. The report will be tabled before Parliament in the upcoming session for discussion. The Congress’s Jairam Ramesh, Manish Tewari and Gaurav Gogoi, and the TMC’s Derek O’Brien and Mahua Moitra filed the dissent notes with committee chairperson PP Chaudhury on Monday after the 30-member panel adopted the final version of the report on Monday ahead of Parliament’s Winter Session beginning next week, people aware of the matter said.
Final draft 9 compatibility software#
The only time I ever got the software to open was when I double-clicked on it, which caused me to run afoul of the error I mentioned above.Īt the moment, I've rolled back my computer to Windows 8.Five Opposition members of the parliamentary committee reviewing the data protection bill have filed dissent notes citing a lack of oversight, failure to quantify penalties, absence of state-level data protection authorities (DPAs), and “unbridled” exemptions for the government as cause for concern in the panel’s final report. Now, Final Draft 9 often suffers an error that prevents from saving files as PDFs unless you right-click the Final Draft icon and select "Run As Administrator." I used to able to do this without any problems in Windows 8.1, but after upgrading to Windows 10, I would select "Run As Administrator", confirm that I wanted to open the software, and nothing would happen. I love the look and feel of it, but there's this one thing that kept being a problem for me: I'm an aspiring screenwriter and like most aspiring screenwriters (and most professionals), my software of choice is Final Draft 9.
Final draft 9 compatibility windows 10#
I upgraded to Windows 10 yesterday and for the most part, it was fantastic.